This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 114927

Summary: Terrible performance editting an ant script
Product: xml Reporter: brettbergquist <brettbergquist>
Component: Text-EditAssignee: Samaresh Panda <samaresh>
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME    
Severity: blocker CC: issues, mikhailmatveev, tonybeckham
Priority: P3 Keywords: PERFORMANCE
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows XP   
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter:
Attachments: The script that is being editted

Description brettbergquist 2007-09-06 17:47:44 UTC 
NB 6.0 Build 200709040000

The editor is pausing and performance is terrible trying to edit the attached ant script.  The script has a few large
CDATA sections that contains SQL database schema creation code.  

The problem occurs on a freshly booted Dell Latitude D810 2Ghz/2Gb memory machine with nothing else running.
Comment 1 brettbergquist 2007-09-06 17:48:35 UTC 
Created attachment 48304 [details]
The script that is being editted
Comment 2 brettbergquist 2007-09-06 17:49:31 UTC 
The editor also is trying to present "suggestions" even while in this CDATA section.  Probably the code completion
should be disabled when in a CDATA section...
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2007-09-06 18:00:41 UTC 
I can reproduce some slowness making edits inside the CDATA sections, though it is not crippling on my computer.

Turning off the ant/grammar module has no apparent effect, so I assume this is a general XML editing issue.
Comment 4 Samaresh Panda 2008-01-08 23:06:52 UTC 
With Netbeans 6.0, Windows Vista on x86 and JDK1.6.0_03, I do not see such a bad performance, however, I agree that
there should be no CC inside CDATA section.

Would you try this on 6.0 and post your observation.
Comment 5 Samaresh Panda 2008-01-08 23:28:42 UTC 
Correction, I did some more tests. There is no CC inside CDATA section. Can you give me a specific example where the CC
brings up "no seggestion" inside CDATA?

Please try 6.0 or later build.
Comment 6 Samaresh Panda 2008-07-22 23:05:45 UTC 
Looks much better in 6.5.