This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 150569

Summary: [65cat] NullPointerException at org.netbeans.modules.spring.beans.ui.customizer.SpringCustomizerPanel.editGroupButtonActionPerformed
Product: javaee Reporter: rajivderas <rajivderas>
Component: SpringAssignee: nairsujit <nairsujit>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: blocker    
Priority: P3    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=129744
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter: 129744
Attachments: stacktrace

Description rajivderas 2008-10-17 17:29:24 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200810170201)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 11.0-b15, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_10-b33
OS: Windows XP, 5.1, x86

User Comments:
rajivderas: go to jsp/spring web project  properties select spring category and add a group and the unselect the added group and click edit group button.

Dev Build 200810170201



Stacktrace: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at org.netbeans.modules.spring.beans.ui.customizer.SpringCustomizerPanel.editGroupButtonActionPerformed(SpringCustomizerPanel.java:494)
        at org.netbeans.modules.spring.beans.ui.customizer.SpringCustomizerPanel.access$800(SpringCustomizerPanel.java:71)
        at org.netbeans.modules.spring.beans.ui.customizer.SpringCustomizerPanel$8.actionPerformed(SpringCustomizerPanel.java:342)
        at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1995)
        at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2318)
        at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:387)
Comment 1 rajivderas 2008-10-17 17:29:45 UTC
Created attachment 72142 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 nairsujit 2008-11-26 03:42:25 UTC
Closing it as a duplicate. Almost the same workflow is being followed in both cases and the stacktraces point to NPE
generated from same methods.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 151946 ***