This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 166582

Summary: [G1 GC from JDK 6.0u14] NullPointerException at org.netbeans.modules.java.source.util.LowMemoryNotifier.addLowMemoryListener
Product: java Reporter: tboerkel <tboerkel>
Component: SourceAssignee: Rastislav Komara <moonko>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: blocker CC: issues, mmirilovic, tboerkel
Priority: P2    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=152256
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter: 152256
Attachments: stacktrace

Description tboerkel 2009-06-05 08:24:25 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE 6.7 RC1 (Build 200905282243)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.0-b16, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_14-b08
OS: Windows Server 2008, 6.0, x86

User Comments:
tboerkel: Starting NB 6.1 RC with the G1 GC from JDK 6.0u14.



Stacktrace: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at org.netbeans.modules.java.source.util.LowMemoryNotifier.addLowMemoryListener(LowMemoryNotifier.java:106)
        at org.netbeans.modules.java.source.usages.BinaryAnalyser.start(BinaryAnalyser.java:146)
        at org.netbeans.modules.java.source.indexing.JavaBinaryIndexer$1.run(JavaBinaryIndexer.java:83)
        at org.netbeans.modules.java.source.indexing.JavaBinaryIndexer$1.run(JavaBinaryIndexer.java:70)
        at org.netbeans.modules.java.source.usages.ClassIndexManager.writeLock(ClassIndexManager.java:100)
        at org.netbeans.modules.java.source.indexing.JavaBinaryIndexer.index(JavaBinaryIndexer.java:70)
Comment 1 tboerkel 2009-06-05 08:24:32 UTC
Created attachment 83223 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Marian Mirilovic 2009-06-05 09:17:20 UTC
performance team,
any suggestions about G1 GC ? 
Comment 3 Marian Mirilovic 2009-06-05 09:17:21 UTC
*** Issue 166577 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 Jan Lahoda 2009-06-05 09:28:35 UTC
See issue #158421.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 158421 ***