This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | Not able to deploy a web project when there is no java file in the project | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | serverplugins | Reporter: | Satyaranjan D <satyaranjan> |
Component: | Infrastructure | Assignee: | issues@javaee <issues> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | blocker | CC: | mmirilovic, pjiricka |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Version: | 6.x | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: |
Description
Satyaranjan D
2009-06-12 14:56:29 UTC
What glassfish version do you use? I'm not able to reproduce the problem. I was using Glassfish Enterprise Server 2.1 which comes with NetBeans 6.7 Bundle. But after re-installing the NetBeans 6.7 RC2, I am not able to reproduce the issue again. You may close this bug if it's not reproducible. it works for me in NB 6.7 RC3 with GFv2.1 as well ... please reopen once you are able to reproduce it Same Problem noticed... Env:WindowsXp+NB6.7+Portalpack3.0.2 I tried this on 2 different machines.. On machine1(Error noticed) I got this error on machine 1 ..As we know it the exception goes after we create a simple java file and deploy again. The error is also seen when deploying a plain web-app on glassfish.The plain webapp doens;t have any *.java files. After creating a java file deploy worked on glassfish. The error is also seen while depoying a theme-app on webspace.The theme app also contains no *.java file. On machine2 I tried doing a fresh install of NB6.7 on a different machine with portalpack3.0.2 plugins +NB 6.7 I couldnlt see this error at all(both on webspace and glassfish) You are right this is a problem, which was meanwhile investigated and fixed in issue 167755. See that issue to track the progress, the fix is available in the NB 6.8 daily builds: http://bits.netbeans.org/netbeans/trunk/nightly/, and will be also included in NB 6.7 Patch 1. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 167755 *** |