This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 170558

Summary: Go To Implementaion Is not there
Product: ide Reporter: neolivz <neolivz>
Component: CodeAssignee: issues@ide <issues>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: blocker    
Priority: P3    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT Exception Reporter:
Attachments: We have a compleacted interfface show all the implementation. But it would have been better if its simple and and shows all the overidden methods.
Every implemented methdo has an option to go to definition, but the reverse is not there, which is the one we use more common.
Rather than complicated full page dialog, if all the implementations are showed in this format would be much appritiated.

Description neolivz 2009-08-18 14:51:17 UTC
Hi,
    Even though I can go see all the implementations, there is no option to go to direct implementation of a method.

My previous editor (Idea) has one feature i miss here most is go to implementation. At one click they show me all the
classes that extends/implements the class and override/implement the method. On Ctrl+Alt+'Click' they show the dialog
and I can go to the implementation directly.

Regards,
Jishnu
Comment 1 neolivz 2009-08-18 14:52:38 UTC
Created attachment 86399 [details]
We have a compleacted interfface show all the implementation. But it would have been better if its simple and and shows all the overidden methods.
Comment 2 neolivz 2009-08-18 14:53:43 UTC
Created attachment 86401 [details]
Every implemented methdo has an option to go to definition, but the reverse is not there, which is the one we use more common.
Comment 3 neolivz 2009-08-18 14:54:35 UTC
Created attachment 86402 [details]
Rather than complicated full page dialog, if all the implementations are showed in this format would be much appritiated.
Comment 4 vikas_s 2009-08-18 15:05:13 UTC
+1.

I can't understand why such a frequently used feature got left out! :-(
Comment 5 neolivz 2009-08-19 06:41:03 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 142112 ***