This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 170758 - Tag action works recursively
Summary: Tag action works recursively
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: versioncontrol
Classification: Unclassified
Component: CVS (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@versioncontrol
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-21 22:08 UTC by mperezma
Modified: 2011-02-11 22:26 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description mperezma 2009-08-21 22:08:15 UTC
Steps to reproduce:

- Create package aa and add a class NewClass to it.
- Create package aa.bb and add a class NewClass2 to it.
- Invoke CVS Tag action in the aa package.

Expected: Only aa.NewClass is tagged.

Result: aa.bb.NewClass2 is also tagged.
Comment 1 Peter Pis 2009-09-08 13:55:41 UTC
Fixed.

http://hg.netbeans.org/cdev/rev/d4d1f10ca3fd
Comment 2 Quality Engineering 2009-09-11 21:41:01 UTC
Integrated into 'main-golden', will be available in build *200909111401* on http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/nightly/ (upload may still be in progress)
Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/rev/d4d1f10ca3fd
User: Peter Pis <ppis@netbeans.org>
Log: #170758: Tag action doesn't process flat folders recursively now.
Comment 3 mperezma 2011-02-10 22:59:01 UTC
I've reproduced it again in NB7.0beta2
Comment 4 mperezma 2011-02-10 22:59:47 UTC
Switch to tag and switch to branch actions are also working recursively.
Comment 5 Ondrej Vrabec 2011-02-11 08:43:44 UTC
cannot reproduce. i tried the scenario from the first comment and only aa/NewClass.java was tagged.
Provide steps to reproduce if you had done something different. BTW, you tagged from the Projects view, right?
Comment 6 mperezma 2011-02-11 22:26:56 UTC
You're right, only aa package is tagged. Please excuse-me for the mistake :(