This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 100616-e0ee2491f1a5) VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 16.3-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_20-b02 OS: Linux User Comments: dkonecny: happened after IDE started. have several project types opened. mostly maven ones. GUEST: startup Stacktrace: java.lang.AssertionError: org.netbeans.modules.web.project.WebProject violates #185464 at org.netbeans.modules.projectapi.AuxiliaryConfigImpl$1.run(AuxiliaryConfigImpl.java:86) at org.netbeans.modules.projectapi.AuxiliaryConfigImpl$1.run(AuxiliaryConfigImpl.java:82) at org.openide.util.Mutex.readAccess(Mutex.java:288) at org.netbeans.modules.projectapi.AuxiliaryConfigImpl.getConfigurationFragment(AuxiliaryConfigImpl.java:82) at org.netbeans.modules.j2ee.common.project.ui.AbstractLogicalViewProvider.isVisualWebLegacyProject(AbstractLogicalViewProvider.java:751) at org.netbeans.modules.j2ee.common.project.ui.AbstractLogicalViewProvider.hasBrokenDataSource(AbstractLogicalViewProvider.java:771)
Created attachment 100290 [details] stacktrace
project.getLookup() => null, apparently.
6278ee01aff9
6.9.1_CANDIDATE?
I was wondering about that but I thought it has just a few exception reports so perhaps it does not happen that often? On the other hand fixing it in 691 does not do any harm. :-)
Add in reports from bug #185464 and its duplicates and you get another 15.
Please verify bugfix for this bug ASAP, so it can be integrated into release691 repository. Thanks, -R
Where is the fix? Not in main-silver, not in jet-main.
Last chance for inclusion in release691. Please verify within 4 hours from now, since I have got limited time to transplant remaining bugfixes into release691 repository. June 25, 1 PM Prague time is my deadline. After that time, please do also the transplant/porting work if you want to include it. Thank you for understanding, -R
I had Thu and Fri off. The fix was pushed now.
Davide, please verify A.S.A.P. Dik, -R
Patch seems to be OK IMHO. For long-term solution, leaking of this from constructor should be avoided, if possible.
main #6278ee01aff9 transplanted to release691 #741a8d67f754
Can't reproduce anymore - seems to be OK now.
*** Bug 185464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***