This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 74547 - Tables which have existing POJOs not disabled after restart
Summary: Tables which have existing POJOs not disabled after restart
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 139854
Alias: None
Product: javaee
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Persistence (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Dongmei Cao
URL:
Keywords:
: 123763 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 95534
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-04-06 23:48 UTC by Rochelle Raccah
Modified: 2008-07-17 19:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
project (23.60 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-04-06 23:50 UTC, Rochelle Raccah 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rochelle Raccah 2006-04-06 23:48:09 UTC 
1) Start the IDE with a new userdir
2) Open the project which I will attach
3) Register GlassFish in the server manager
4) Wait for scanning classpaths to complete
5) Right click on Source Packages, choose New File/Folder
6) Open the new Entity from DB wizard
7) Choose the package1/JavaApplication1 dbschema file

Bug is that PRIMITIVE_TYPES table is not disabled because of the existing POJO
in the same package.

Note that I tried a second time after my IDE had been open for several hours and
it was disabled.
Comment 1 Rochelle Raccah 2006-04-06 23:50:00 UTC 
Created attachment 29679 [details]
project
Comment 2 Andrei Badea 2006-07-28 10:39:03 UTC 
Need to wait for ORMMetadata to finish scanning.
Comment 3 Andrei Badea 2007-02-15 17:47:01 UTC 
Could be handled by the new metadata model.
Comment 4 Andrei Badea 2008-01-15 12:23:31 UTC 
Need to use the metadata model to check for existing entity classes in JavaPersistenceGenerator. A bit tricky, since the
model should not be called in the AWT thread.
Comment 5 Andrei Badea 2008-01-15 16:57:06 UTC 
*** Issue 123763 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 Dongmei Cao 2008-07-17 19:55:32 UTC 
Fixed in changeset 617eac3402b2

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 139854 ***