This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 101688 - REST WS template should not have its own category
Summary: REST WS template should not have its own category
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: webservices
Classification: Unclassified
Component: REST (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Nam Nguyen
URL:
Keywords:
: 101338 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 106380
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-04-19 06:04 UTC by Pavel Buzek
Modified: 2007-06-22 22:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
patch, feel free to apply (972 bytes, text/plain)
2007-04-20 19:07 UTC, Lukas Jungmann 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Pavel Buzek 2007-04-19 06:04:20 UTC 
The list of categories in NFT wizard is already terribly crowded, especially in
Big IDE with all components installed, and one item does not justify a whole new
category. Put the template into Web Services category. This is very visible,
thus P2. Can it be fixed for M9 (j1 preview)?
Comment 1 Lukas Jungmann 2007-04-19 06:50:17 UTC 
and the name should be "REST Web Services from Entity Classes" not from "...
Entity Beans"
Comment 2 Lukas Jungmann 2007-04-19 06:51:05 UTC 
*** Issue 101338 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 3 jrojcek 2007-04-19 10:42:41 UTC 
Reassigning to web services owner.

Please fix for M9.
Comment 4 Pavel Buzek 2007-04-20 00:35:57 UTC 
fixed together with bug 101686
Comment 5 Lukas Jungmann 2007-04-20 19:06:17 UTC 
Category is "Web Services", not "WebServices"...
Comment 6 Lukas Jungmann 2007-04-20 19:07:12 UTC 
Created attachment 41366 [details]
patch, feel free to apply
Comment 7 Nam Nguyen 2007-04-20 19:29:44 UTC 
Fixed for this wizard particular issue.

Pavel: 
This behavior could be a bug in layer file system where omission is interpreted
as removal.  The behavior forces redeclaration of folder everywhere.  This would
be a performance problem and also make rename requiring refactoring.  Is this a
known bug?
Comment 8 Lukas Jungmann 2007-06-22 22:51:36 UTC 
v.