This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
The following code confuses java editor but compiles just fine: ---- CODE BEGIN ---- package generics.bug; abstract class AbstractResponse { } abstract class AbstractRequest<T extends AbstractResponse> { } interface Handler { <R extends AbstractResponse, Q extends AbstractRequest<R>> R execute(Q request); } class Response extends AbstractResponse { private int number; public Response(int number) { this.number = number; } public int getNumber() { return number; } } class Request extends AbstractRequest<Response> { private int data; public Request(int data) { this.data = data; } public int getData() { return data; } } public class TestCase implements Handler { public static void main(String... args) { TestCase test = new TestCase(); Response response = test.execute(new Request(1)); response.getNumber(); // gets through the IDE built-in parser just fine // \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ test.execute(new Request(1)).getNumber(); // DOES NOT WORK // shows popup with "cannot find symbol AbstractResponse.getNumber() // \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ } public <R extends AbstractResponse, Q extends AbstractRequest<R>> R execute(Q request) { System.out.printf("execute DONE, request class %s%n", request.getClass().getName()); return null; } } ---- CODE END ---- Observed for 6.1 and 6.5 m1 on Windows XP, JDK 1.6.0_05: Product Version: NetBeans IDE 6.1 (Build 200804211638) Java: 1.6.0_05; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 10.0-b19 System: Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86; Cp1251; ru_RU (nb) Product Version: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200807040101) Java: 1.6.0_05; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 10.0-b19 System: Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86; Cp1251; ru_RU (nb) The same code causes no issues in Eclipse 3.2 and above. Thank you.
reproducible workaround: test.<Response,Request>execute(new Request(1)).getNumber();
Seems like a duplicate of issue #129581. See also: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6650759 *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 129581 ***