This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 156232 - java project properties window become larger than screen size
Summary: java project properties window become larger than screen size
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 153877
Alias: None
Product: projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Generic Projects UI (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Milan Kubec
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-01-02 18:57 UTC by emiddio
Modified: 2009-02-19 22:56 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
view1 (172.71 KB, image/jpeg)
2009-01-02 19:05 UTC, emiddio
Details
view2 (183.96 KB, image/jpeg)
2009-01-02 19:07 UTC, emiddio
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description emiddio 2009-01-02 18:57:08 UTC
took a maven project -- jersey/jax-rs source code -- copied all code to new directory; removed poms/xml files wanted
to create new simple java project of the .java file -- to easily look for class files with mains.

put src root at top of copied tree -- didnt care if .java files in proper folder vs package names;

then right mouse project, choose properties -- and the dialog/popup is about 2/3 of entire screen size -- with
slider scroll bars both horizon/vertiti -- such that larger than physical screen size if could fully expand.

no way to restore window to normal size -- so becomes a big pain to use;
using Window/restore windows -- will not fix issue; have to delete netbeans - .netbeans/6.5 directory and re-initialize
to fix issue -- so is very big pain -- this has happened 2 times so far with nb65
Comment 1 emiddio 2009-01-02 19:05:08 UTC
Created attachment 75410 [details]
view1
Comment 2 emiddio 2009-01-02 19:07:04 UTC
Created attachment 75411 [details]
view2
Comment 3 Jaromir Uhrik 2009-01-05 21:18:20 UTC
Passing to projects|ui which seems to be the proper place - please evaluate. Thanks.
Comment 4 Milan Kubec 2009-01-06 08:34:49 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 153877 ***