This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 158573 - [65cat] java.io.IOException at org.netbeans.api.java.source.ModificationResult.processDocument
Summary: [65cat] java.io.IOException at org.netbeans.api.java.source.ModificationResul...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 113378
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@editor
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-02-15 06:50 UTC by saeed_z_f
Modified: 2009-02-19 20:45 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 146331

Attachments
stacktrace (4.23 KB, text/plain)
2009-02-15 06:50 UTC, saeed_z_f 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description saeed_z_f 2009-02-15 06:50:32 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200812180001)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 11.0-b16, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_11-b03
OS: Windows XP, 5.1, x86

User Comments:
saeed_Z_F: Occure when i use introduce method refactoring action.



Stacktrace: 
java.io.IOException
        at org.netbeans.api.java.source.ModificationResult.processDocument(ModificationResult.java:356)
        at org.netbeans.api.java.source.ModificationResult.commit2(ModificationResult.java:325)
        at org.netbeans.api.java.source.ModificationResult.access$000(ModificationResult.java:83)
        at org.netbeans.api.java.source.ModificationResult$2.run(ModificationResult.java:230)
        at org.netbeans.editor.GuardedDocument.runAtomic(GuardedDocument.java:324)
        at org.openide.text.NbDocument.runAtomic(NbDocument.java:384)
Comment 1 saeed_z_f 2009-02-15 06:50:38 UTC 
Created attachment 76996 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Vitezslav Stejskal 2009-02-16 10:52:06 UTC 
Looks the same as issue #113378.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 113378 ***