This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 169451 - IDE sleep
Summary: IDE sleep
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 166578
Alias: None
Product: php
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: rmatous
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-07-29 12:58 UTC by danilchenko_anton
Modified: 2009-09-14 09:59 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
Test php file with source. Open in you IDE (1.38 KB, text/plain)
2009-07-29 12:59 UTC, danilchenko_anton
Details
My processor diagram (if IDE sleep) (128.94 KB, image/png)
2009-07-29 17:00 UTC, danilchenko_anton
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description danilchenko_anton 2009-07-29 12:58:33 UTC
After latest update IDE (my native version 6.7) I see bug.

I attach php file with test source.

1. open file (attached)
2. in class name add _Comment (in result see Days_Model_Comment)
3. save file (ctrl+s)
4. wait 10 seconds
5. select typed in step 2 part of class name "_Comment" and press "Backspace" key
6. IDE sleep on unlimit time
7. kill process :)

This bug I see every time. Please, fix this bug and release new patch for php available for update manager.
Waiting for fix. Thanks!
Comment 1 danilchenko_anton 2009-07-29 12:59:22 UTC
Created attachment 85440 [details]
Test php file with source. Open in you IDE
Comment 2 danilchenko_anton 2009-07-29 13:02:48 UTC
Maybe problem in construction like this:

class Days_Model extends Days_Model {

where similar name of class and parent class. Expect this please.

P.S. I use Ubuntu x64 OS with latest NetBeans 6.7 (with installed updates from update manager).
Comment 3 danilchenko_anton 2009-07-29 17:00:32 UTC
Created attachment 85480 [details]
My processor diagram (if IDE sleep)
Comment 4 Filip Zamboj 2009-09-10 14:24:37 UTC
The first one might be a bug => reassigning to responsible developer. 

I don't think that abstract class can have the same name as the class that extends it ... => the second comment is not
relevant. 
Comment 5 rmatous 2009-09-14 09:59:21 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 166578 ***