This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 172321 - AWT thread blocked for 40250 ms.
Summary: AWT thread blocked for 40250 ms.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 173109
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jesse Glick
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
Depends on:
Blocks: 173109
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-09-15 18:41 UTC by Jan Lahoda
Modified: 2010-02-04 13:45 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 158551

Attachments
nps snapshot (48.54 KB, bin/nps)
2009-09-15 18:41 UTC, Jan Lahoda 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jan Lahoda 2009-09-15 18:41:31 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build jet-main-1201-on-090908)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 11.0-b16, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_11-b03
OS: Linux, 2.6.28-11-generic, i386
Maximum slowness yet reported was 40250 ms, average is 40250
Comment 1 Jan Lahoda 2009-09-15 18:41:56 UTC 
Created attachment 87715 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 2 rmichalsky 2009-09-29 15:34:06 UTC 
Stack Analyzer probably really needs all registered source roots, thus full module list scan is IMHO necessary in this
case and I don't see any potential significant speed up in apisupport. I guess Stack Analyzer could do the navigation in
background. CC-ing Honza Becicka, as he seems to be the original author of Stack Analyzer, don't know if he still
maintains it.
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2009-09-29 15:36:33 UTC 
Check my snapshot. I do not think I even have stackanalyzer installed (whatever it is).
Comment 4 rmichalsky 2009-09-29 19:51:28 UTC 
I see, your snapshot is quite different, I wonder why has it been marked as duplicate. In this case full module scan is
quite needless, will be resolved with issue #173109.
Comment 5 Jesse Glick 2010-02-04 13:45:49 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 173109 ***