This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 174747 - Apisupport doesn't detect dependency cycle
Summary: Apisupport doesn't detect dependency cycle
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: rmichalsky
URL:
Keywords:
: 69574 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-16 13:18 UTC by t_h
Modified: 2010-07-02 20:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description t_h 2009-10-16 13:18:23 UTC 
Just try to add dependency on openide.dialogs to api.progress. Triggered "Collecting project dependencies" is never
finished...even after restart scan is never finished (I let it run over night). I had to revert project.xml to be able
to start IDE. Reproducible always, I also tried 6.7 and 6.5 and the problem is same.
Comment 1 rmichalsky 2009-10-16 15:00:20 UTC 
openide.dialogs depends on api.progress, so the problem is that apisupport doesn't detect dependency cycle correctly and
goes into endless loop. Decreasing to P3.
Comment 2 rmichalsky 2009-10-19 17:31:28 UTC 
Now checked in UI and if cycle introduced manually, scan does not loop forever.
core-main #711aaf7b9fb1
Comment 3 Quality Engineering 2009-10-22 23:50:42 UTC 
Integrated into 'main-golden', will be available in build *200910221401* on http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/nightly/ (upload may still be in progress)
Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/rev/711aaf7b9fb1
User: Richard Michalsky <rmichalsky@netbeans.org>
Log: #174747: dependency cycles check in apisupport projects, optimization of recursive test classpath scan.
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2010-07-02 20:06:58 UTC 
*** Bug 69574 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***