This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
The categorization of Options has made it harder to find things, because individual options are now concealed within a hierarchy and I don't see a way to help the user find where in the hierarchy an item lies. For example, if I don't know how something was categorized, then I have to open folders and expose items in the hierarchy till I find it. Just now I was looking for the "Modules" option, but I didn't know how it was categorized. It was harder for me to find than it was before when everything was in a single list (and I could scan down the list till I saw "Modules"); I found it in folder "IDE Configuration" / "System". It would help if this new options panel allowed a way to search for something in a way that is quicker than the user opening folders and visually scanning. For example, for the top node in the tree, you could add a menuitem "Find..." to its popup menu; also allow ^F to do the same thing from anywhere in the tree (also, on the main menu, enable menuitem Edit-->Find). These commands would display the standard netbeans Find dialog and allow users to search the Options hierarchy. When a "hit" occurs, the hierarchy would be opened down to that point and that node would be selected. For example, in my case I could have searched for "modules".
agreed. a complete revamp of the options system is being looked at in planning right now. the discussion has already started on nbui with Tim's prototype for re-organizing the options: http://www.netbeans.org/servlets/ReadMsg?msgId=221596&listName=nbui the ability to search could be added -though it would be nice to greatly simplify options first.
It is planned (long-term) to make such search type, and it belongs to utilities module.
Set target milestone to TBD
Anyone know the status of this issue? I want to implement the Find/Search capability in Options as well
As far as I know, nobody has started design or implementation of this feature.
Will be fixed as a part of 58412 *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 58412 ***