This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 21308 - Bogus source created in default package w/ Swing editor
Summary: Bogus source created in default package w/ Swing editor
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 14546
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@java
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-03-07 15:03 UTC by Jesse Glick
Modified: 2007-09-26 09:14 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Generated class (184 bytes, text/x-java)
2002-03-07 15:03 UTC, Jesse Glick 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jesse Glick 2002-03-07 15:03:09 UTC 
[dev mar 07] Create a build of the IDE with -Dmodules=java and start
on a fresh user dir. MDI mode. Mount a fresh directory and select its
root. Select File | New | Classes | Class. Create file Foo in the
default package. When it appears, it is corrupted: see attachment.
Sometimes the extra "public " does not appear, but the broken comment
does.

Creating a file in a non-default package works OK.

It is reproducible, but only when the editor module is *not* enabled.
So I suspect that the code generator does not work correctly with the
Swing plain-text editor kit (I use JDK 1.3.1_02) and is accidentally
dependent on some detail of the NetBeans editor's Document
implementation. Should be checked against Emacs (externaleditor) as
well.
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2002-03-07 15:03:39 UTC 
Created attachment 4987 [details]
Generated class
Comment 2 Tomas Hurka 2002-03-07 15:27:35 UTC 
Yes, you are right. There is difference in Swing implementation and
Edtor implementation. See isuue #14546. I guess this issue is
duplicate of 14546.
Comment 3 Tomas Hurka 2002-03-08 10:07:54 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 14546 ***
Comment 4 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 13:11:22 UTC 
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.
Comment 5 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 13:21:22 UTC 
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.