This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 238471 - org.netbeans.modules.form.VisualReplicator.createClone: LowPerformance took 20502 ms.
Summary: org.netbeans.modules.form.VisualReplicator.createClone: LowPerformance took 2...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: guibuilder
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 7.3
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: issues@guibuilder
URL:
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-11-17 02:04 UTC by Exceptions Reporter
Modified: 2013-11-18 14:30 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 205341


Attachments
nps snapshot (224.75 KB, application/nps)
2013-11-17 02:04 UTC, Exceptions Reporter
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Exceptions Reporter 2013-11-17 02:04:01 UTC
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 212234, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE 7.3.1 (Build 201306052037)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 23.21-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.7.0_21-b11
OS: Windows 8

User Comments:
GUEST: Why?



Maximum slowness yet reported was 20502 ms, average is 20502
Comment 1 Exceptions Reporter 2013-11-17 02:04:05 UTC
Created attachment 142275 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 2 Tomas Pavek 2013-11-18 14:30:53 UTC
The attached snapshot does not show the reported 20s but only 8s in AWT Event Queue thread. Most of it spent in org.jdesktop.beansbinding.Binding.bind(), specifically in constructing BeanInfos for related component classes. It's probably rather unusual taking so much time, it depends on the complexity of the bean classes used in the binding and number of bindings. Same work needs to be done in runtime. So this is related to the internals of the beansbinding library, don't think we should try to workaround in in the IDE.