This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 244077 - OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
Summary: OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 243485
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Filesystems (show other bugs)
Version: 8.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Jaroslav Havlin
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-04-25 12:45 UTC by leewilson86
Modified: 2014-05-09 12:30 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 209303

Attachments
stacktrace (2.35 KB, text/plain)
2014-04-25 12:45 UTC, leewilson86 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description leewilson86 2014-04-25 12:45:11 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE 8.0 (Build 201403101706)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 24.45-b08, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.7.0_45-b18
OS: Mac OS X

User Comments:
leewilson86: I was doing nothing... I had actually left my system idle for almost an hour due to a client meeting and when I came back, the IDE was unresponsive




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
   at java.io.UnixFileSystem.resolve(UnixFileSystem.java:108)
   at java.io.File.<init>(File.java:262)
   at java.io.File.listFiles(File.java:1206)
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.children.ChildrenSupport$2IOJob.run(ChildrenSupport.java:257)
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.fileobjects.FolderObj.refreshImpl(FolderObj.java:467)
   at org.netbeans.modules.masterfs.filebasedfs.fileobjects.BaseFileObj.refresh(BaseFileObj.java:843)
Comment 1 leewilson86 2014-04-25 12:45:13 UTC 
Created attachment 146939 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Jaroslav Havlin 2014-05-09 12:30:54 UTC 
The same case as bug 243485, huge number of file events generated in a single atomic operation.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 243485 ***