This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 41444 - consider bundling also JUnit sources
Summary: consider bundling also JUnit sources
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 108952
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: JUnit (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: junit-issues@java
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 41448
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-03-28 18:00 UTC by David Konecny
Modified: 2008-11-25 19:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Konecny 2004-03-28 18:00:15 UTC 
Subject says all.
Comment 1 Tomas Pavek 2004-05-14 13:55:12 UTC 
The goal is actually not to bundle junit at all - just use some
"standard" or 3rd party junit package distr (RPM, etc) - which would
contain also the sources. But this won't be done for NB 4.0 as there
does not seem to be a suitable package available. And we also won't
add the sources for the bundled junit in NB 4.0.
Otherwise having sources for junit is quite useful I think.
Comment 2 Tomas Pavek 2004-05-14 13:59:08 UTC 
BTW why is this "buildsys" related issue?
Comment 3 David Konecny 2004-05-17 09:41:36 UTC 
Buildsys changed way how the libraries are defined. The JUnit J2SE
library was defined, but not all its capabilities were utilized, i.e.
the sources were not provided.

If you agree that it is useful, why do you do not want to provide
them? Isn't it a matter of adding a jar? Or are there some licencing
problems?
Comment 4 Marian Petras 2008-11-25 19:42:29 UTC 
This issue has been re-evaluated during evaluation of issues #129619 ("Update to JUnit 4.5") and #108952 ("Add JUnit
sources to IDE to enhance debugging").

The request for addition of JUnit sources is now tracked in issue #108952, so I am closing this issue (41444) as a
duplicate of that one (108952).

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 108952 ***