This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 42361 - o.o.awt.Actions does a bad job of handling '&' in action names
Summary: o.o.awt.Actions does a bad job of handling '&' in action names
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 43594
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Window System (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: David Simonek
URL:
Keywords:
: 43436 43558 43680 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 41535
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-04-22 21:17 UTC by Jesse Glick
Modified: 2008-12-22 22:46 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jesse Glick 2004-04-22 21:17:53 UTC 
o.o.awt.Mnemonics looks like it is pretty careful
about how '&' is treated. But Actions is not so
careful, and sometimes thinks '&' is introducing a
mnemonic when clearly it is not, e.g. before a
space character. Examples:

1. Context menu item on NBM projects should read
"Build with Dependencies & Try" but appears as
"Build with Dependencies  Try".

2. Toolbar button has a tooltip "Clean  Build Main
Project (Shift-F11)" whereas the menu item is
"Clean & Build Main Project".
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2004-05-18 14:11:57 UTC 
*** Issue 43436 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2004-05-18 14:13:19 UTC 
Probably all mnemonic-handling code in Actions should be reviewed and
either deleted in favor of Mnemonics or merged with that somehow.
There is currently some confusing redundancy even in the API.
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2004-05-21 16:14:06 UTC 
P2; fairly visible.
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2004-05-21 16:14:27 UTC 
*** Issue 43680 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 Radko Najman 2004-05-25 14:16:10 UTC 
*** Issue 43558 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 Jesse Glick 2004-06-15 13:09:25 UTC 
Marek, didn't you already fix something here?
Comment 7 mslama 2004-06-15 13:40:49 UTC 
Yes it is fixed as issue #43594. (At least partially.)

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 43594 ***
Comment 8 mslama 2004-06-15 13:43:10 UTC 
See also issue #43998 for more details.
Comment 9 Marian Mirilovic 2005-07-14 13:11:55 UTC 
verified duplicate