This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 58625 - Missing support for apisupport project node actions/icons
Summary: Missing support for apisupport project node actions/icons
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Krauskopf
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 57776
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-05-05 14:51 UTC by _ pkuzel
Modified: 2005-12-13 11:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description _ pkuzel 2005-05-05 14:51:23 UTC 
Please allow CVS (and others) to plug-in actions into your project type node.
See issue #57776 that contains example based on J2SE project (most project types
are copy&pasted).

The contract is defined by issue #57874 and documented in projects/projectuiapi
Architecture document.
Comment 1 _ pkuzel 2005-05-10 10:23:26 UTC 
netbeans.org is behind firewall, using runsocks wrapper...
Checking in src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/Actions.java;
/cvs/apisupport/project/src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/Actions.java,v
 <--  Actions.java
new revision: 1.33; previous revision: 1.32
done
Comment 2 _ pkuzel 2005-05-26 17:45:52 UTC 
Actions OK, Icon badging still missing..
Comment 3 _ pkuzel 2005-05-30 16:22:27 UTC 
Project icon CVS annotated

LogicalView.java
new revision: 1.22

Pending TODOs with listening on Sources and SourceGroup.
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2005-09-07 21:27:57 UTC 
Martin can you evaluate? I'm not really sure what concretely is still missing.
Comment 5 Martin Krauskopf 2005-09-27 16:16:45 UTC 
I'm not either, after short evaluation. Petre can you tell us the case when the
current implementaion is not enough. What should be actually fixed?
Comment 6 _ pkuzel 2005-09-27 16:34:20 UTC 
[phone] Martin mentioned there are static source roots. No need to handle changes.
Comment 7 Martin Krauskopf 2005-09-27 16:38:02 UTC 
And also seems that there are not any problem for quite a long time, also not
any reproducible test case. So your commits fixed it. Thanks, closing.
Comment 8 pzajac 2005-12-13 11:00:37 UTC 
verified