This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 85830 - Right-click RUN or DEBUG on configuration
Summary: Right-click RUN or DEBUG on configuration
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: javame
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Build System (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: luky
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-09-26 20:27 UTC by ieising
Modified: 2007-08-28 12:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ieising 2006-09-26 20:27:36 UTC
Hi,

I think the new configuration branch in de project tree is great. It would be
nice if I could right-click on it and build, clean, run, debug, deploy etc that
particular configuration from a context menu. It was the first thing I did, and
was disappointed finding out it couldn't be done.

Iwan
Comment 1 Lukas Hasik 2006-09-27 08:15:05 UTC
reassigning. It seems as nice enhancement to me. 

I'd like to see a proposal of all actions available on the config. tree first.
It'd be better to discuss it before implementing. 
Comment 2 luky 2007-05-25 15:30:44 UTC
New actions added on configuration nodes with obvious meanings
running on single selected configuration
1) Run configuration
2) Debug configuration

running on multiple selected configurations even across different projects
3) Build selected configurations
4) Clean&Build selected configurations
5) Clean selected configurations
6) Deploy selected configurations

Comment 3 Lukas Hasik 2007-06-06 13:21:15 UTC
please, set up the correct target milestone for FIXED issue. It's not obvious
from date in what build the issue has been fixed.

thank you
Comment 4 luky 2007-06-06 13:50:17 UTC
sorry
Comment 5 Lukas Hasik 2007-08-28 12:34:20 UTC
verified in 08/27 build

-the names of actions are not consistent with the new names proposed by issue 110580