This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 95236 - CustomerCMP sample can't be created
Summary: CustomerCMP sample can't be created
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: usersguide
Classification: Unclassified
Component: JavaEE (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Tomasz Slota
URL:
Keywords: RANDOM, REGRESSION
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-02-12 11:34 UTC by Dan Kolar
Modified: 2007-07-02 13:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
Alert (42.53 KB, image/png)
2007-02-12 11:46 UTC, Dan Kolar
Details
messages.log (109.47 KB, text/plain)
2007-02-12 11:47 UTC, Dan Kolar
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dan Kolar 2007-02-12 11:34:32 UTC
build 200702111900 nb60m7 jdk1.6b105 glassfish v2 b33

1) New -> Samples -> Enterprise -> CustomerCMP sample -> Next
2) Finish

In New Project panel a "Cannot get exclusive access to ..." alert is shown and
sample creation fails.
Comment 1 Dan Kolar 2007-02-12 11:46:08 UTC
Created attachment 38357 [details]
Alert
Comment 2 Dan Kolar 2007-02-12 11:47:20 UTC
Created attachment 38358 [details]
messages.log
Comment 3 Petr Jiricka 2007-06-29 14:21:05 UTC
Tomasz, is this issue still valid?
Comment 4 Tomasz Slota 2007-06-29 14:44:53 UTC
Probably not, I cannot reproduce it. Andrei, do you know in what circumstances we could be showing such a message? It is (rather) not possible that this file 
already existed or that the file system was read-only, it would have been detected and signaled with a different message.
Comment 5 Andrei Badea 2007-06-29 15:35:26 UTC
I guess the message is displayed when obtaining an InputStream for a FileObject and never closing it. Hard to tell where
exactly it happens without steps to reproduce the issue.
Comment 6 Tomasz Slota 2007-07-02 13:43:41 UTC
Most likely this issue is not valid any longer.