This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 72218 - load .settings dfferently in layer view than in run ide
Summary: load .settings dfferently in layer view than in run ide
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 72541
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jesse Glick
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-03 14:08 UTC by Tomas Danek
Modified: 2006-10-23 16:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
exception (11.07 KB, text/plain)
2006-02-03 14:52 UTC, Tomas Danek
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tomas Danek 2006-02-03 14:08:38 UTC
1) 20060203 trunk, created standalone module
2) created new AU center, leave all default
3) try to invoke Properties on: Important files | XML layer | This layer |
Services | Autoupdate type | module 1 Update center
4) neverending stream of MRE's -> P2

Not sure if it's your fault, just assigning to template owner:) , feel free to
reassigne..
Comment 1 Tomas Danek 2006-02-03 14:52:48 UTC
Created attachment 28738 [details]
exception
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2006-02-03 15:42:22 UTC
Don't do that. If you ask for properties on a .settings file in the layer, it
really tries to load it; and in this case it cannot, since the module is not
installed in the dev IDE. Not an issue of either autoupdate or the template,
just a fact of how the <this layer> nodes work.
Comment 3 pzajac 2006-02-06 12:20:56 UTC
Show properties is normal action of user. I know that it is not ease to fix it.
But it is defect. 
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2006-02-06 17:23:25 UTC
If and when I figure out how to do that...
Comment 5 Jesse Glick 2006-02-14 18:05:59 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 72541 ***
Comment 6 Tomas Danek 2006-02-15 13:54:08 UTC
won't be better to set those issues as dependent, not like duplicates?? just for
better tracking..
Comment 7 Jesse Glick 2006-02-15 22:27:34 UTC
Re. set as dependent - feel free to do so if you want. No strong opinion.
Comment 8 Tomas Danek 2006-02-20 13:17:06 UTC
in current state it would require huge IZ refactoring (=>lot of spam), there's a
lot of duplicate issues of Rewrite layer nodes.   - leaving it this way.
Comment 9 Jesse Glick 2006-02-20 18:49:20 UTC
Of course during a rewrite I would look at the list of duplicates to make sure I
hadn't forgotten any important issues.
Comment 10 Tomas Danek 2006-10-10 14:52:47 UTC
verified duplicate